Search Results for "agreement termination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "agreement termination"

2121 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2121 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Section 9 Order Against Transferee of Property in Arbitration Dispute — Lis Pendens Applies to Non-Signatory Purchaser. Arbitration clause binds subsequent purchaser of property subject to arbitration agreement, and lis pendens applies to Section 9 proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Jul 2024

The appellant, M/s Devtree Corp. LLP, purchased a property from the original owner who was a party to a development agreement containing an arbitratio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Clause 27.4 of Agreement Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, but Third Party Respondent No.5 Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Licensee Cannot Claim Right to Continue Occupation After Expiry of License Term. The Court held that a licensee must vacate upon expiry of the license period and cannot resist eviction by claiming additional security deposit or improvements without proof.

5 May 2026

The Petitioner, Mohammed Arbaaz Aziz Farooqui, was a licensee of Flat No. 143, B-Wing, 14th floor, Heera Panna CHS, Tulsiwadi, Mumbai, under a registe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Assessee's Failure to Prove Revenue Expenditure. The court held that the assessee did not discharge its burden to show that the expenditure was revenue in nature under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Aug 2023

The case pertains to an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had upheld the CI...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.

1 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

20 Feb 2015

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contractual Dispute — Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal Upheld Despite Appointment of Third Arbitrator by Appointing Authority. The court held that the appointment of a third arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without party consultation, is valid when one party fails to appoint its arbitrator, and the award on merits, including interest at 18% per annum, is not against public policy.

14 Sep 2010

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of the District Judge, Pune, which ...

66 67 68 69 70

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)