Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7011 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7011 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Order in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Section 212(2) Notice Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Time for Compliance.

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by owners of lands and structures within the limits of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compensation for Defective Cotton Seeds — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal When Defect Not Disputed. Compensation Upheld but Interest Reduced from 24% to 12% Under Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009 and Rules, 2010.

The petitioner, M/s Bayer Bio Science Private Limited, a seed manufacturing company, challenged an order dated 29 December 2011 passed by the Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...