Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1953 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1953 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Based on SEBI Consent Order. The Court Reviews the Effect of Consent Order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act on Pending Trial for Offences under Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The petitioner, an accused in two criminal cases arising from alleged illegalities in the Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of Yes Bank Limited and Infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition Concerning Stop-Work Notice for Construction Project. Dispute Centered on Measurement of Land and Prior Court Order Permitting Construction at Developer's Own Risk.

The litigation concerns a construction project undertaken by M/s.Shantai Group, a builder-developer partnership firm, in Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023

The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Extortion Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 386, 387, 447, 506, 109 IPC Are Compoundable or Non-Serious, and Continuation Would Be Futile.

The applicants (accused) filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of RCC No.3212 of 2015 arisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of POCSO and IPC Proceedings on Compromise Between Accused and Complainant Who Later Married. Marriage Between Accused and Complainant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 CrPC as Continuation Would Be Abuse of Process.

The applicants, Taj @ Arjun S/o. Ajay Mishra (accused) and Ragini Ashok Amarnani (complainant), jointly filed a criminal application under Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...