Search Results for "tender scrutiny"

765 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claims of Resigned Judicial Officers in Service Law Dispute. Resignation Does Not Forfeit Statutory Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Judicial Officers with Over 12 Years of Service.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former judicial officers of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service. The petitioners, Jeevan Kashinat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Price Adjustment Dispute Under World Bank-Financed Contract. Court Upholds Majority Award's Interpretation of Price Adjustment Clause but Modifies Interest Rate from 18% to 12%.

The petitioner, M/s. Angerlehner Structurals & Civil Engineering Co., was awarded a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MMC) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Acquisition Compensation Award. Market Value Determined by Ready Reckoner Rates Upheld for Recreational Ground Reservation.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai challenged an award dated 3rd November 2017 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which determined compensation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajaykumar s/o Sambhunath Naik, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards for Lack of Concluded Contract. Joint Exploration Agreement Held Not Binding as Conditions Precedent Not Fulfilled, Resulting in No Valid Arbitration Agreement.

The case involves appeals by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (appellants) against M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (respondent)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...