Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition for Abuse of Process — Petitioner Found to Have Consistently Misled Courts from Civil Court to Supreme Court. Review Petition Filed Under Liberty Granted by Supreme Court Dismissed with Costs of Rs. 5 Lakhs for Deliberate Misrepresentation and Suppression of Material Facts.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 64
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns a Review Petition (L) No. 19103 of 2019 filed by Mohd Talib Habib Shaikh, who was respondent no. 7 in Writ Petition No. 2061 of 2018 and a respondent in Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2018. The review petition was filed pursuant to a liberty granted by the Supreme Court on 3rd July 2019 in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 14345 of 2019, seeking review of a common order dated 7th June 2019 passed by the Bombay High Court. The court, comprising Justices S.C. Dharmadhikari and G.S. Patel, dismissed the review petition with costs of Rs. 5,00,000, finding that the petitioner had consistently and deliberately misled courts from the Civil Court to the Supreme Court by suppressing material facts and making false statements. The court noted that the petitioner had obtained the liberty from the Supreme Court by misrepresentation and had abused the process of law. The judgment emphasizes the need to deter such conduct to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review Petition - Abuse of Process - Suppression of Facts - The review petitioner, who was a respondent in the original writ petitions, sought review of an order dated 7th June 2019. The court found that the petitioner had consistently and deliberately misled courts from the Civil Court to the Supreme Court by suppressing material facts and making false statements. The court held that such conduct amounts to an abuse of the process of law and dismissed the review petition with exemplary costs of Rs. 5,00,000. (Paras 1-10)

B) Civil Procedure - Liberty Granted by Supreme Court - Scope of Review - The review petition was filed pursuant to a liberty granted by the Supreme Court on 3rd July 2019 in SLP (C) No. 14345 of 2019. The court examined whether the liberty could be used to re-agitate issues already decided. It held that the liberty did not permit the petitioner to misrepresent facts or suppress material information, and the review petition was liable to be dismissed on grounds of abuse of process. (Paras 1-5)

C) Civil Procedure - Costs - Exemplary Costs for Misleading Courts - The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,00,000 on the review petitioner, payable to the Bombay High Court Legal Services Committee, for deliberately misleading courts and wasting judicial time. The court emphasized that such conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial process and must be deterred. (Paras 10-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the review petition, filed pursuant to liberty granted by the Supreme Court, should be entertained given the petitioner's consistent and deliberate misrepresentation and suppression of material facts before multiple courts.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Review Petition is dismissed with costs of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs) to be paid by the review petitioner to the Bombay High Court Legal Services Committee within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Review petition
  • abuse of process
  • suppression of facts
  • misleading courts
  • liberty granted by Supreme Court
  • dismissal with costs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-AS:19836-DB

Review Petition (L) No. 19103 of 2019 in Writ Petition No. 2061 of 2018

2019-07-10

S. C. Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel

2019:BHC-AS:19836-DB

Mr Shahid Anwar, with Mr Jamil Khan, Mr Arif Siddique and Mr Feroz Ansari (for Review Petitioner); Mr Pandit Kasar (for Petitioner in WP 2061/2018); Mr RS Apte, Senior Advocate, with Mr NR Bubna (for Respondents 1 to 6 in WP 2061/18 and Respondent 1 in WP 2659/18); Mr VM Mali, AGP (for Respondent 8 in WP 2061/18)

Mohd Talib Habib Shaikh

Mohammad Siddaqi Haji Mohammad Momin, Bhiwandi Nijampur City Municipal Corporation, The Commissioner, Additional Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Law Officer, Assistant Commissioner, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review petition seeking review of a common order dated 7th June 2019 in two writ petitions, filed pursuant to liberty granted by the Supreme Court.

Remedy Sought

Review of the order dated 7th June 2019 in Writ Petition No. 2061 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2018.

Filing Reason

The petitioner alleged that the order suffered from errors apparent on the face of the record and that he had been denied an opportunity of hearing.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court granted liberty to file a review petition on 3rd July 2019 in SLP (C) No. 14345 of 2019.

Issues

Whether the review petition should be entertained given the petitioner's consistent and deliberate misrepresentation and suppression of material facts before multiple courts.

Submissions/Arguments

The review petitioner argued that the order dated 7th June 2019 suffered from errors apparent on the face of the record and that he was not heard. The respondents contended that the petitioner had misled courts and suppressed facts, and the review petition was an abuse of process.

Ratio Decidendi

A party who has consistently and deliberately misled courts and suppressed material facts cannot be permitted to avail of the remedy of review, as such conduct amounts to an abuse of the process of law. The court has inherent power to dismiss such petitions with exemplary costs to deter such behavior.

Judgment Excerpts

This Review Petition is filed pursuant to a liberty granted by the Supreme Court on 3rd July 2019 in Special Leave Petition (C) No. 14345 of 2019. We have found, on a careful consideration of the material before us, that this Review Petitioner has for over a year consistently and constantly, and quite deliberately, misled court after court from the Civil Court right up to the Hon’ble Supreme Court itself.

Procedural History

The review petition was filed on 10th July 2019 pursuant to liberty granted by the Supreme Court on 3rd July 2019 in SLP (C) No. 14345 of 2019, seeking review of a common order dated 7th June 2019 in Writ Petition No. 2061 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 2659 of 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 47 Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition for Abuse of Process — Petitioner Found to Have Consistently Misled Courts from Civil Court to Supreme Court. Review Petition Filed Under Liberty Granted by Supreme Court Dismissed with Costs of Rs. 5 Lak...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case, Allows Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) on Undisclosed Income. Deduction under Section 80IB(10) is allowable on undisclosed income computed under Section 69A, and a fresh claim can be r...