Search Results for "sufficient reasons"

11511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reassessment Initiated Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material or Failure to Disclose by Assessee is Invalid.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s German Remedies Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Sonography Centre Registration Renewal for Violation of Natural Justice under PCPNDT Act. Civil Surgeon's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 19B(4) and Failure to Provide Hearing.

The petitioner, Dr. Sadanand M. Ingle, a medical practitioner running a sonography centre at Khamgaon, challenged the order dated 21/12/2012 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Central Government's Notification Substituting Nominated Member of Cantonment Board. Legality of Substitution Under Section 13(3) of Cantonments Act, 2006, Without Following Removal Procedure Under Section 34, is in Issue.

The writ petition was filed by a nominated member of the Deolali Cantonment Board challenging a notification dated 06.03.2025 by the Central Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for FIR Registration Due to Police Inaction. Failure to Register FIR Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution and the Mandatory Duty under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, an agriculturist, claimed ownership and possession of agricultural land in Naribole village, Kalaburagi district. A dispute arose when...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...