Search Results for "special planning authority"

1196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment on Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 13424 of 2026

The matter pertained to a commercial arbitration petition filed by the developer, Wadhwa Estates and Developers (India) Private Limited, against respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Alternative Remedy Under Section 351 Available.

The petitioner, Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 1st August...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MIDC's Demand for Service Charges at Allegedly Agreed Rate. Service charges must be based on statutory notification under Section 14 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, not private negotiation.

The petitioner, Federation of Association of Industries, through its President Shyamsundar Vasudev Agrawal, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.

The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.

The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...