Search Results for "sentence upheld"

2747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent to Cause Fire and Mischief.

The case arises from a complaint lodged by Smt. Muktabai w/o Manikrao Khausade alleging that on the night of 28 May 1999, the appellants Chandrakant K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Laxman Janu Kokare, was convicted under Section 376(f) of the Indian Penal Code for the aggravated rape of a 9-year-old girl on 9 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in NDPS Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The applicant, Jhamsingh s/o Kedarsingh Jamadar, was convicted by the trial court for possession of 3 kg 200 grams of ganja under the Narcotic Drugs a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Dowry Death and Cruelty — Demand of Rs. 50,000 and Persistent Harassment Proved. Circumstantial Evidence Including Oral Dying Declaration and Threat Calls Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The appellant, Faizan Ahmed Abdul Wahab Shah, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 186...