Search Results for "security document"

2174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Mysore Minerals Limited in Arbitration Challenge — Rejects Reappreciation of Evidence Under Section 34. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract terms is final and not perverse, affirming dismissal of petition to set aside award.

The appellant, Mysore Minerals Limited (MML), a government undertaking engaged in mineral extraction and export, issued a tender notice on 18.5.1995 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in MOU Dispute Between Developer and Public Trust. Arbitration Clause in MOU dated 16 June 2011 Held Valid and Binding Despite Non-Formation of Special Purpose Entity.

The petitioner, M/s. Devike Constructions and Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...