Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

1984 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1984 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses First Defendant's Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Injunction Orders in Specific Performance Suit. Court upholds trial court's finding of lawful possession based on prima facie case and balance of convenience under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The petitioner, the first defendant in a suit for specific performance, challenged the concurrent orders of the trial court and appellate court granti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Unexplained Cash Credit of Rs.40 Lakhs Confirmed as Income Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Loan Transactions.

The appellant, Shri Basayya R Nandegol, a civil contractor, filed his return of income for the assessment year 2007-08 declaring a total income of Rs....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...