Search Results for "Charge Defect"

1018 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1018 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Push by Knee Causing Fall on Stony Steps Not Sufficient to Attract Section 304 Part II IPC as No Intention to Cause Death or Knowledge of Likely Death Established.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original complainant, Sagarbai Bansode, challenging the acquittal of the accused, Ke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Grandson in Murder of 82-Year-Old Grandmother over Property Dispute. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Convict Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sagar Dwarkanath Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his 82-year-old grandmother, Smt. Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC in Dismemberment Murder Case. Accused Challenge Life Imprisonment Contending Weak Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Witnesses.

The case involved the brutal murder and dismemberment of Archideb Bhattacharjee in 2003 after he refused to pay an extortion demand of Rs.40,000 to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case as Medical Evidence Fails to Conclusively Prove Homicidal Death. Circumstantial Evidence Chain Broken Where Doctor Could Not Rule Out Suicide or Accident, Giving Benefit of Doubt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ganesh Balbhim Kshirsagar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicated Three Writ Petitions Involving Ownership and Compensation for Land at Village Ulwe. The Petitions Raised Issues Under the Inam Abolition Act, Land Acquisition Act, and the Indian Forest Act Regarding Vesting, Compensation, and Restoration of Possession.

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court concerning land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at village Ulwe, Taluka Panvel,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 read with 34 IPC. The appeal challenges the trial court's reliance on eyewitnesses and the application of common intention when co-accused were acquitted.

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant (original accused 2) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals From Accused Against Rejection of Discharge Applications in Organised Crime Case. Court Finds Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement in Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999.

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered seven criminal appeals filed by the appellants, who were accused in Special (M.C.O.C.) Case No.4 of ...