Search Results for "third party purchaser"

1240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes License Suspension in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Procedural Violation in Inspection and Appeal. Failure to Provide Inspection Report and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Suspension Order Unsustainable Under Rule 66(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

The petitioner, M/s. Raj Pharma, a partnership firm holding a valid drug license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945, challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Suit for Coparcenary Property Based on Pre-1956 Female Succession. Widow's acquisition of property under Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 is not a coparcenary asset but her absolute estate under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.08.2019 in O.S. No. 101/2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot, partl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Development Not Concluded Due to Missing Essential Terms. Failure to Prove Concluded Contract for Sale of Land as Agreement Lacked Certainty of Terms and Was Subject to Further Negotiations.

The appellant, Ramesh Amarnath Malhotra, a builder and developer trading as Deonar Development Corporation, filed a suit for specific performance of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1930 OF 2011

...