KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "share purchase"
1708 result(s) found
Found 1708 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Discretionary Order Refusing Interim Injunction in Passing Off Suit — Visual Wrapper Similarity and Ordinary Purchaser Test Examined. Court Examines Whether Emphasis on Dissimilarities Rather Than Similarities Amounted to Error of Principle.
28 Sep 2021The present appeal arose from a suit for passing off and copyright infringement filed by ITC Limited (plaintiff) against CG Foods (India) Private Limi...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Approval Under Section 151. Reassessment Notice Issued Beyond Six Years Without Proper Sanction from Specified Authority Held Invalid.
18 Mar 2024The petitioner, Vibrant Securities Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange, challenged a reassessment notice date...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.
18 Dec 2019The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Review Order of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Matter. The Court held that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing its earlier order without any error apparent on the face of the record, restoring the order that recognized the petitioner's sub-tenancy rights under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.
11 Jan 2013The case involves a dispute over agricultural land in Karad, Satara. The original landlady, Saraswatibai Kulkarni, leased the suit land to the respond...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
15 Jul 2026The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Escrow Agreement; Dosti Group Opposes Citing Abandonment of Arbitration. Dispute Arises from Non-Payment of Purchase Consideration Under Share Purchase Agreement, with Kotharis Alleging Concealment of Tenant Consents and Claiming Release of Escrowed Sun Pharma Shares.
3 Nov 2025This matter involved a commercial arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Kotharis seeking a...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal: Profit from Share Sales Held as Trading Income, Not Capital Gain. Purchase and Quick Resale of Shares with Borrowed Funds and Debiting Interest as Revenue Expenditure Indicated a Well-Planned Scheme to Earn Profits under the Income Tax Act, 1922.
31 Jul 1969The assessee firm, Juggilal Kamlapat, Kanpur, was engaged in promoting companies and financing sister concerns of the J.K. Group. During the assessmen...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Refers Question of Interpretation of Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. Property received by Hindu female in lieu of maintenance under a will creating life estate raises question whether it falls under Section 14(1) or 14(2).
9 Dec 2024The present appeal arises from a suit for declaration and possession filed by the respondents (son and grandson of the testator) against the appellant...
- 1171
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.
18 Jan 2022The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...
- 328
