Search Results for "notice under section 19(2)"

686 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 686 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Brand Rate Drawback Claims for Tea Exports. Confirms revocation of brand rate letters and recovery of drawback amounts with interest due to failure to prove actual duty payment.

The petitioners, Hindustan Lever Limited and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Limitation Bar and Lack of Debt Evidence. Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Dismissed as Notice Served on 10.12.2013 and Complaint Filed on 20.01.2014, Beyond 30 Days.

The applicants, Vishnu Pavse and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Lack of Proof of Joint Family Property. Court holds that the burden to prove that property is joint family property lies on the party asserting it, and mere joint family status does not create a presumption.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) claiming that the suit schedule properties are joint family properties of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator for Cooperative Bank under Section 64 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Appointment of Administrator by Registrar of Cooperative Societies upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 64(1) of the Act.

The petitioner, Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, a cooperative bank registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, file...