Search Results for "defendant's right"

5819 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5819 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Stay Damages Claim in Admiralty Suit for Wrongful Arrest of Bunkers. Court Examines Argument That Suit for Interim Security Pending Arbitration Does Not Disclose Cause of Action, Reliance on BALCO Judgment.

An admiralty suit was filed by a foreign company against, inter alia, the bunkers on board the vessel M.V. African Eagle and its charterers, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Settlement Deed by Father Not Invalid as Properties Were Self-Acquired, Not Ancestral. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ancestral Nature of Suit Properties Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction claiming that the suit properties were ancestral properties of Arunachala ...