Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Compulsory Service Bonds of ESIC Medical Students; Questions Validity Under ESI Act and Constitution
6 Apr 2026...
Search Results for "contract basis"
6412 result(s) found
Found 6412 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Canal Construction Contract — Upholds Arbitrator's Award on Premium Rate at 93.12% for Extra Work, Remits Claim No.8 for Reconsideration, and Restores Interest at 12% Per Annum
14 Feb 2020The dispute arose from a contract dated 05.02.1985 between Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (claimant) and the State of Punjab (opposite party) f...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Bombay Restrains Invocation of Bank Guarantee in Contract Dispute Due to Disputed Claims and Absence of Clear Forfeiture Clause. The court held that an unconditional bank guarantee can be restrained only in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice, but where the guarantee is not encashed and the dispute is pending, interim protection can be granted to maintain status quo.
5 Nov 2020The petitioner, M/s. Cipel, a construction company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judi...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Demolition of Illegal Structures in CRZ Area. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to retain unauthorized constructions violating CRZ Notification 2011 and Environment Protection Act, 1986.
28 Jul 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by 30 individuals challenging the demolition of their structures by the Goa Coastal Zone Management ...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
1 Jul 2014The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Contract in Railways Tender Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Before Termination Under General Conditions of Contract.
14 Dec 2022The petitioner, a contractor engaged in washing and ironing bedroll linen for the South Western Railways, was awarded a contract on 17.10.2022. Howeve...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal; Upholds Finding that Suit for Specific Performance Is Barred by Limitation. Court Rules Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.
18 Jul 2018The case arose from an agreement dated 6.10.1997 between the appellant, Rajesh Dayaldas Narwani, and the respondent, Kanayalal D. Bablani, whereby the...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Termination of Contract. Court holds that existence of disputes and arbitration agreement is sufficient for appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, even if the underlying contract is terminated.
30 Nov 2023The appellant, Madgavkar Salvage, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against the order of the Commercial Court rejecting its application under Sectio...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Commercial Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act — Petitioner Contends Award Ignores Contractual Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Award of Rs.25.27 Crore Granted by Arbitrator Based on Letter Dated 15 November 2019 is Alleged to be Perverse and Patently Illegal, Ignoring That Payments Were Contingent on Receipts from Rural Development Department.
5 Dec 2025The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11 July 2024. The Arbitral...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Desilting Policy Tender Conditions as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Petitioners Contend Conditions Violate Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and Disregard Court's Directive in PIL No.143 of 2012.
18 Mar 2019The High Court of Bombay heard four connected writ petitions challenging certain conditions stipulated in a Government Resolution dated 03.08.2018 iss...
- 60
