Search Results for "children's obligation"

1109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rights of Juvenile Offender; Directs Production Before Judicial Officer Holding Charge. Medical Report Disclosing Juvenility Not Acted Upon, Leading to Violation of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000; Investigating Agency's Primary Obligation Affirmed.

The petitioner, a juvenile offender, was arrested on 23 April 2004 and remanded to judicial custody. A charge-sheet was filed on 5 May 2004, but the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Terminating Employee with Speech and Language Disability. Court Examines Compliance with Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 in Employment Termination.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay, challenging the termination of the petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court's Interim Residence Order in Domestic Violence Case. Residence Order Under Section 19 of DV Act Cannot Be Passed as Interim Relief Before Disposal of Main Application Under Section 12.

The petitioner, Mr. Amit Satish Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 March 2013 passed by the Family Court. The Family Court had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...