Search Results for "Tenant Revision"

1048 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1048 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Executability of Decree on Ground of Non-Compliance with Order XX Rule 4 CPC. Judgment Debtor Cannot Raise Nullity of Decree Under Section 47 CPC After Ex-Parte Decree Became Final and Earlier Application to Set Aside Was Dismissed.

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Srinivasa Doss (petitioner) against P.Kalaidasan and P.Seshian (respondents) challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Renewal Dispute. HPCL's Claim of Statutory Right to Renew Lease Under Section 7(3) of Caltex Act Rejected as Lease Was Not Renewed Before Expiry of Original Term.

The case involves a dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), the revision applicant, and the legal heirs of Mansukhlal Doshi, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order in Leave and Licence Case Under Section 13-A(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Licensee Holding Over After Expiry of Licence Period Is Not a Tenant and Competent Authority Has Jurisdiction to Order Eviction.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Mrs. Poonam V. Matta (the petitioner) against an eviction order passed by the Competent Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant to File Written Statement in Eviction Case Despite Delay Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Section 43(4) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, does not bar acceptance of written statement if delay is condoned with costs.

The petitioner, Deepak N. Gulwani, a tenant, challenged three orders: (1) an order dated 15-4-2014 allowing the respondent-landlord's application to p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition and Disposes Landlord's Petition in Eviction Matter; Decree on Alternative Accommodation Under Section 13(1)(l) of Bombay Rents Act Upheld. Premises Already Demolished and in Landlord's Possession Renders Bona Fide Requirement Issue Academic.

The litigation arose from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning three ground-floor rooms in a house at Ahmednagar. The original plaintiff (landlord) fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Ejectment Order in Rent Dispute. Subletting Without Landlord's Consent Under Section 15 of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Justifies Eviction.

The petitioner, Rasiklal Kumbha Gala, was the original respondent in an ejectment application filed by the respondent, Manilal Ravji, before the Addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Decree for Possession and Arrears in Commercial Lease Dispute — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent and Vacate Premises. Landlord Entitled to Recovery of Possession, Rental Arrears, Damages for Use and Occupation, and GST with Interest at 18% Per Annum.

The plaintiff, Faisal Khan, filed a suit in the High Court of Judicature at Madras seeking recovery of possession of his commercial property located a...