High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Section 326"
1083 result(s) found
Found 1083 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court Ensures Fair Probe Amidst Political and Personal Tensions" "A landmark decision to uphold justice and fairness in politically charged scenarios."
4 Dec 2024The Supreme Court of India, in the case, exercised its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution to transfer the investigation o...
- 349
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Trial Court's Disbelief of Injured Witnesses and Eyewitnesses Was Justified Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 326, 149 IPC.
9 Feb 2021The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Sangli, dated 06.03.1997, in Sessions Case No. 139/1995, whic...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
1 Aug 2011The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...
- 72
High Court
Madras High Court Examines Challenge to Denial of Outdoor Advertisement License. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Order Dated 06.06.2024 and Direction to Grant License under Urban Local Bodies Rules, 2023.
3 Feb 2025The litigation arose from the rejection of a license application for an outdoor advertisement hoarding by the Greater Chennai Corporation. The petitio...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Five Accused in Murder Case Citing Unreliable Evidence. Possibility of Accused Being Innocent Not Ruled Out as Blood Group Evidence Inconclusive and Eye-Witness Accounts Suffered from Omissions and Delay.
22 Jun 2017The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28th April 1999 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Jal...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Externment Based on Acquitted Cases and Pending Matters Without Live Link to Future Conduct Held Invalid. The court held that subjective satisfaction under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, must be based on material showing a live link between past acts and future threat, and acquittals cannot be used to justify externment.
8 Feb 2023The petitioner, Nitin Kale, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Amravati, under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of th...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Dealer in Sales Tax Case Regarding Packing Materials Used in Exports. Purchase Tax Not Leviable on Packing Materials Sold Along with Exported Goods Under Section 14 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
18 Mar 2010The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra Sta...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Discharge Appeal in NIA Case — Appellant Discharged from MCOC and UAPA Offences but Retained for Murder and Explosives Charges. The court held that a prima facie case exists for offences under Sections 302/307 IPC and Explosives Act, but not for organised crime or terrorist activities.
2 Jan 2023The appellant, Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, original accused No.9, filed an appeal under Section 21(1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, cha...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Use Pre-Committal Witness Testimonies for Contradiction in De Novo Trial Under Section 145 of Evidence Act. The court held that de novo trial does not wash out prior testimonies recorded by Magistrate, and they can be used to contradict witnesses under Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
6 Oct 2017The petitioner, Raju Haridas Khelkar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 354 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code before the Magistrate. After the...
- 49
