Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Trial Court's Disbelief of Injured Witnesses and Eyewitnesses Was Justified Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 326, 149 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Sangli, dated 06.03.1997, in Sessions Case No. 139/1995, which acquitted all 12 accused persons charged under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149, and 326 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The case arose from three incidents on 27.03.1995 in villages Wakurde and Padawalwadi, Sangli District, resulting in the death of Baban Tanaji Thorat. The prosecution examined injured witnesses PW No.11 Ramesh and PW No.13 Anna, and four eyewitnesses to the assault on the deceased. The trial Court disbelieved their testimony due to contradictions and inconsistencies. The High Court considered whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving these witnesses. The State argued that the trial Court erred, but the High Court found no perversity in the trial Court's assessment. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the acquittal.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appreciation of Evidence - Injured Witness - Trial Court disbelieved the evidence of injured witness PW No.11 Ramesh and PW No.13 Anna due to contradictions and inconsistencies - Held that the trial Court's assessment was not perverse and the acquittal was justified (Paras 1-2).

B) Criminal Law - Appreciation of Evidence - Eyewitness - Four eyewitnesses to the assault on deceased were disbelieved by trial Court - Held that their testimony lacked credibility and corroboration - State appeal dismissed (Paras 1-2).

C) Criminal Law - Unlawful Assembly - Sections 147, 148, 149 IPC - Accused charged for rioting and murder - Trial Court found no reliable evidence to prove common object - Held that acquittal was proper (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving the evidence of injured witness PW No.11 Ramesh, injured witness PW No.13 Anna, and four eyewitnesses on the point of assault on the deceased, and consequently acquitting the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Acquittal of all 12 accused persons upheld.

Law Points

  • Appreciation of evidence
  • Injured witness testimony
  • Eyewitness credibility
  • Unlawful assembly
  • Common intention
  • Acquittal reversal
  • State appeal against acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 54

Criminal Appeal No. 492 of 1997

2021-02-09

Prasanna B. Varale, S.M. Modak

2021:BHC-AS:1265-DB

Mrs M.M. Deshmukh (APP for Appellant/State), Mr S.B. Shetye a/w Ms Priyanka Chavan (Advocate for respondent Nos. 1,2,4 to 6, 8, 10 to 12)

The State of Maharashtra

Jaysing Vitthal Shetke and 11 others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal

Remedy Sought

State sought reversal of trial Court's acquittal of 12 accused persons

Filing Reason

Trial Court disbelieved evidence of injured witnesses and eyewitnesses, leading to acquittal

Previous Decisions

Trial Court (Additional District Judge, Sangli) acquitted all accused on 06.03.1997 in Sessions Case No. 139/1995

Issues

Whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving the evidence of injured witness PW No.11 Ramesh? Whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving the evidence of injured witness PW No.13 Anna? Whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving the evidence of four eyewitnesses on the point of assault on deceased?

Submissions/Arguments

State argued that trial Court erred in disbelieving the injured witnesses and eyewitnesses. Respondents supported the trial Court's findings.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial Court's disbelief of injured witnesses and eyewitnesses was not perverse; the evidence lacked credibility and corroboration, justifying acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue involved in this appeal is whether the trial Court was right in disbelieving the evidence of one injured witness and other witnesses. All these questions have arisen in present appeal which is preferred by the State against the judgment delivered by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sangali on 06.03.1997 in Sessions Case No. 139/1995.

Procedural History

Trial Court acquitted all 12 accused on 06.03.1997. State appealed to High Court on 09.02.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 147, 148, 149, 302, 326
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony. Trial Court's Disbelief of Injured Witnesses and Eyewitnesses Was Justified Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 326, 149 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Delay Condonation Application in Specific Performance Suit — Unexplained Delay of Over 8 Years Not Condonable. Cross-Objection Filed After 3015 Days Without Sufficient Cause Rejected Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 19...