Search Results for "Majority rule"

2384 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2384 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Compassionate Appointment Due to Inordinate Delay of 24 Years. Petitioner's father died in 1977, but petitioner applied only in 2001; held disentitled to relief under Article 226.

The petitioner, Satish @ Rajesh s/o Kanbarao Balkhande, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus for compassionate appointment on the ground that his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Entry Tax Act — State Legislature Competent to Levy Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Outside State. Levy of Entry Tax Under Entry 52 List II Not Repugnant to Central Sales Tax Act and Is a Reasonable Restriction Under Article 304(b).

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant No.1 (since deceased) against the judgment and decree dated 01.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeals Challenging High Court's Validation of Kamal Vihar Township Development Scheme. Core Legal Question is Whether Scheme Violates Constitution (73rd and 74th Amendments) and Statutory Provisions of M.P. (C.G.) Nagar Thatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973.

The Supreme Court heard a bunch of civil appeals arising from the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, which had upheld t...