Search Results for "Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction"

1914 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1914 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Challenge to GST Demand Confirmation Order. Petition Challenges Order Confirming GST Demand of Rs 70.57 Crores for April 2020 to March 2021.

The petitioner, GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (the surviving entity after its merger with GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements.

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Section 164(2)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 and Press Note Dated 6.9.2017 — Directors of Private Limited Companies Cannot Be Exempted from Disqualification for Non-Filing of Financial Statements.

The petitioners, Mr. Yenugu Krishna Murthy, Mr. Devarunda Manjegowda Purnesh, and Mr. Manjunath Krishnarajanagar Manikyam, filed three writ petitions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Attachment of Decreetal Amount for Unpaid Legal Fees Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC. Legal Practitioner's Claim for Professional Fees and Expenses Upheld as the Only Property of the Defendant Was the Decreetal Amount in Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a suit for recovery of unpaid professional fees and expenses amounting to Rs.1,42,975/- against the respon...