Search Results for "Court Award"

9906 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9906 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Assignee Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Arbitration Agreement Valid Under Sudanese Law; Respondent's Public Policy Challenge Rejected.

The petitioner, Neilan International Co Ltd, a Sudanese company, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 27 September 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court considered writ petition challenging MSME Facilitation Council award and constitutional validity of Section 16 of MSMED Act. Petitioner contended council lacked jurisdiction and award invalid due to missing signature of Chairman.

The writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between JSW Steel Ltd. (formerly Ispat Metallics India Ltd.) as petitioner and Kamlakar V. Salvi, p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...