Search Results for "Article 136 Constitution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Article 136 Constitution"

1448 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1448 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

8 Apr 2026

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Appeal Filed Beyond 90 Days Under NIA Act; Condonation of Delay at Issue. Application for Condonation of 838 Days Delay in Appeal Against Rejection of Bail Under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act Opposed by NIA Citing Outer Limit in Section 21(5) Second Proviso.

14 Sep 2023

The matter concerned an interim application seeking condonation of 838 days delay in filing an appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalists in Fake Encounters Case — No Prima Facie Case of Criminal Conspiracy. Journalists' Role Limited to Reporting, Not Abetment or Conspiracy Under Sections 302, 120B IPC and Other Provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by nine journalists seeking quashing of an FIR and charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Invest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging Goa Public Health (Amendment) Act, 2005 on Grounds of Legislative Competence. The Petitioners Alleged Encroachment on Central Tobacco Act and Occupied Field, Seeking Quashing of State Provisions Banning Tobacco-Containing Food.

7 Jun 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, challenging the con...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016

5 Jul 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

9 Feb 2026

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Writ Petition Involving Zilla Panchayat Office Bearers. Multiple Individuals Filed Petition Against State Authorities Relating to Panchayat Raj Elections.

6 Jan 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Validity of Delimitation Notifications for Panchayat Constituencies. Petitioners Challenged Increase in Seats and Alleged Non-Compliance with Census Guidelines.

19 Aug 2021

The petitioners, residents and aspiring candidates for Zilla and Taluk Panchayat elections in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Loan Recovery Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Article 19 of Limitation Act, 1963. Court holds that a suit for recovery of loan amounts advanced between 1981-1997, filed in 2002, is governed by Article 19 (three years from the date of loan) and not Article 1 (for accounts), as the loan was not a mutual, open, and current account.

8 Feb 2022

The Respondent, Vijay Construction, filed a suit on 31.10.2002 against the Appellants, Pedro Antonio D'Souza and Rita D'Souza, for recovery of ₹4,20...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging High Court's Declaration of Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act as Unconstitutional Due to Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Lacked Authority Under Article 194(3) to Create Parliamentary Secretary Offices, Rendering Both Enactment and Repeal Invalid Under Constitution of India.

1 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the constitutional validity of the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appointment, Salary and Allowances and Miscellaneous Provi...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)