Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "valuation procedure"
1156 result(s) found
Found 1156 result(s)
High Court
- 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.
1 Jan 1970This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...
- 76
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court's Part-Decreed Partition Suit. Appeals Challenge Findings on Validity of Wills and Codicils Executed by Parents in Dispute Over Joint Family Properties.
6 Mar 2023The case involved two regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.
10 May 2013The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...
- 31
High Court
APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
- 16
High Court
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Partition Suit of Plaintiff Coparcener Where Business Started from Ancestral Property Proceeds Constitutes Joint Family Property. Partnership Firms Run Exclusively by Family Members and Funded by HUF Nucleus Are HUF Businesses, and Plaintiff Is Entitled to Equal Share Regardless of Parental Divorce.
30 Jun 2010The plaintiff filed a suit for partition claiming a 1/20th share in properties alleged to belong to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) of his grandfathe...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employee's Section 37 Appeal, Allows Company's Appeals in Arbitration Dispute Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Finding of Voluntary Resignation Upheld as Arbitrator's Award Did Not Suffer From Perversity; Trial Court's Modification Set Aside, Original Award Restored.
26 Sep 2025The proceedings arise from an employment dispute between a Vice President of a private limited company and the company itself, culminating in arbitrat...
