Search Results for "minimum imprisonment"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain.

The appellant, Kishor alias Bajrang s/o Mukundrao Ramteke, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his mother under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case on Ground of Parity and Long Incarceration. Appellant in Custody for Over 5 Years with No Imminent Trial Conclusion.

The appellant, Vaibhav Subhash Raut, was arrested in connection with CR No. 11 of 2018 registered at Kalachowki Police Station for alleged offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Appeal in NIA Case on Ground of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellant, in custody since 2018, granted bail as co-accused similarly situated were released and trial had not commenced, upholding right to speedy trial under Article 21.

The appellant, Mohammad Raisuddin, was arrested in connection with NIA Special Case No. 3/2018 for alleged offences under the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...