Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kishor alias Bajrang s/o Mukundrao Ramteke, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his mother under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was based on circumstantial evidence, primarily that the accused and deceased were residing together, the accused was addicted to vices, and the deceased had objected to his behaviour. On 22.5.2017, the deceased was found dead with injuries. The daughter of the deceased lodged a report alleging that the accused had killed her mother. The trial court convicted the accused. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence and found that the prosecution failed to prove the circumstances beyond reasonable doubt. The witnesses were not reliable, the last seen theory was not established, and the motive was weak. The court held that the chain of circumstances was incomplete and the conviction could not be sustained. The appeal was allowed, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused was acquitted.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Last Seen Theory - The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was last seen with the deceased, as the witnesses were not reliable and the time of death was not conclusively proved. Held that the chain of circumstances was incomplete and the conviction cannot be sustained (Paras 10-15).

B) Criminal Law - Motive - Weakness of Motive - The alleged motive of the accused being addicted to vices and the deceased objecting was not sufficiently proved. Held that motive alone cannot form the basis of conviction without corroborative evidence (Paras 16-18).

C) Criminal Procedure - Examination of Accused under Section 313 CrPC - The accused's explanation that the deceased died due to accidental fall was not properly considered. Held that the trial court erred in rejecting the defence without proper analysis (Paras 19-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • chain of circumstances
  • last seen theory
  • motive
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 313 CrPC
  • benefit of doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 305

Criminal Appeal No.94 of 2021

2023-02-24

Rohit B. Deo, Urmila Joshi-Phalke

Shri D.V. Chauhan for Appellant, Shri M.J. Khan for Respondent

Kishor alias Bajrang s/o Mukundrao Ramteke

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his mother based on circumstantial evidence

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt Whether the last seen theory is established Whether the motive is proved

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove the chain of circumstances and the evidence is unreliable Respondent argued that the circumstances clearly point to the guilt of the accused

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must prove each circumstance beyond reasonable doubt and the chain must be complete. Failure to do so entitles the accused to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant (accused) challenges judgment and order dated 29.12.2018 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.464/2017 whereby the accused is convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer life imprisonment. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused was last seen with the deceased, as the witnesses were not reliable and the time of death was not conclusively proved.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 29.12.2018 in Sessions Trial No.464/2017 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which allowed the appeal and acquitted him on 24.02.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Partially Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 50 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Reference Court's enhancement from Rs. 25 to Rs. 100 per sq.m. set aside as excessive...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain.