Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "mandatory obligation"

2460 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2460 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Promotion Dispute Against Co-operative Bank — Bank Not 'State' Under Article 12. Employee's Claim for Promotion to Deputy Chief Officer Fails as Technical Cadre Employee Not Entitled to Consideration for General Cadre Post.

12 Dec 2005

The appellant, Sudhir Chatarpal Kedar, a Civil Engineer, was appointed as Engineer/Officer Grade-I in the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank in July ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Developer Against Dissenting Society Members. The Court held that balance of convenience favored appointment of Receiver to preserve subject matter pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Shree Krishna Homes Pvt. Ltd., a developer, entered into a development agreement dated 14th December 2011 with respondent No.1, a coop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Teachers in Jalna District. Transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, were upheld as valid and not violative of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 24 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Restores Suit Dismissed as Withdrawn Without Consent of All Plaintiffs in Representative Suit Under Order I Rule 8 CPC. Suit filed under Order I Rule 8 CPC cannot be withdrawn by some plaintiffs without consent of all and without court permission.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, original plaintiffs No.5, 7, and 9, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Passes Interim Orders to Curb Illegal Mining in Odisha and Directs Central Empowered Committee to Identify Violating Lessees. Mining Operations Require Mandatory Clearances Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Non-Compliance Renders Operations Illegal and Subject to Immediate Intervention Under Article 32.

1 Aug 2026

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Common Cause and by Prafulla Samantra and Anr. against the Union of India and ot...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Freedom Fighter Land Grant; Upholds State's Inherent Power to Investigate Fraud. Fraud Vitiates Everything and No Estoppel Arises Against the State; Show Cause Notice and Reference to Lokayukta Under Section 7(2-A) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Are Not Interfered With.

13 Oct 2017

The High Court of Karnataka adjudicated a writ petition filed by Sri S. Sundaresh, son of a deceased freedom fighter, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Application Under Section 434 Companies Act Seeking Transfer of Winding-Up Petition to NCLT. Applicant Argues No Irreversible Steps Taken, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.

23 Jun 2026

The matter arose from a Company Petition filed in 2010 seeking winding up of Broadcast Infratel India Private Limited on grounds of unpaid admitted de...

63 64 65 66 67

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)