Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shaikh Javed and Shaikh Asad, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad for offences under Sections 302 and 324 read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder and Evidence Disappearance Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death or cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the death of Babli, wife of Hublal Chikwa, who died in suspicious circumstances at her matrimonial home in Majari colliery, Chand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of his uncle Gopal Mahadev Bhosa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found doubtful and medical evidence contradicted prosecution timeline.

The case pertains to the murder of Dashrath Charmya Kale, allegedly committed by the appellants, Bhurya @ Gulab s/o Fajitya Kale and his wife Suman, o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared the common object to commit murder.

The appellants were convicted by the Special Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Special Case No. 19 of 2004 for the offence punishable unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Prakash s/o Madhavrao Patil @ Raju Sikandar Radvi, was convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Sessions Case No.131...