Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of his uncle Gopal Mahadev Bhosale under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 21st March 2014 at around 10:30 p.m. in village Shivaji Nagar. The appellant, under the influence of alcohol, started abusing Chayya (wife of PW-5 Rajendra) over a loan issue. The deceased Gopal intervened and asked the appellant to calm down. The appellant then called Gopal out of the house and assaulted him with a bamboo stick on the head and face, causing fatal injuries. The prosecution examined several witnesses including PW-5 Rajendra, PW-6 Sunita (wife of deceased), and PW-3 Mangesh. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence and found that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The appellant had no intention to cause death and acted in the heat of passion. The court held that the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC. The court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone (about 6 years and 4 months). The appellant was ordered to be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Culpable Homicide - Section 302, 304, 300 Exception 4 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sudden Quarrel - The appellant was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC for causing death by a single blow with a bamboo stick during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The High Court held that the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC as the act was done without premeditation in a sudden fight, and the accused did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. Conviction altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. (Paras 10-15)

B) Criminal Law - Sentencing - Section 304 Part I Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court sentenced the appellant to the period already undergone (about 6 years and 4 months) considering the nature of the quarrel, absence of premeditation, and the fact that the appellant was a young man. (Para 16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced to the period already undergone. Appellant to be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Absence of premeditation
  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 18

Criminal Appeal No. 927 of 2015

2020-08-05

S.S. Shinde, M.S. Karnik

Mr. Shailesh Chavan for the Appellant, Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent – State

Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his uncle Gopal Mahadev Bhosale.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable. Whether the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation and no intention to cause death. Prosecution argued that the appellant intentionally caused death by assaulting with a bamboo stick.

Ratio Decidendi

The act was done without premeditation in a sudden quarrel, and the accused did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner, thus falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, making it culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant-accused challenges the judgment rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant-accused mercilessly assaulted Gopal on his face and head by means of a bamboo stick causing serious bleeding injuries. The incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The appellant had no intention to cause death.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304, 300 Exception 4
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: 325
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging BDA Allotment of Site to Public Library Department — Allotment Upheld as Valid and Not Contrary to Law. The court held that the allotment of a civic amenity site for a public library is a ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel, reducing offence to culpable homicide no...