Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 482 OF 2015

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.

The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...