Search Results for "director guarantee"

1138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order on Sale of Secured Asset under SARFAESI Act. The Court Examines Whether Sale on 'As Is Where Is' Basis Was Validly Confirmed and Whether DRAT Erred in Setting It Aside.

The matter arises from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, Asset Rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Permanent Injunction and Damages in Software Development Contract. Suit Alleged Breach of Implied Contract by C-DAC Following Public Advertisement for Tamil Language Software Tools.

The appellant, M/s. Applesoft, a software development firm, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against the respondents, the Centre for Develo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Validation Act in Import Fee Dispute. Parliament Competent to Enact Retrospective Validation to Cure Defect in Subordinate Legislation, Even if It Affects Pending Litigation.

The petitioners, M/s R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd. and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of the Destructive Insects and Pests ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner who did not participate in tender process cannot challenge the award; tender conditions not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Voith Hydro Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...