Search Results for "core need"

2234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Order Refusing to Summon Defence Witnesses in MCOC Case. Issue Pertains to Relevance of Confessions of Other Accused Persons Recorded Under Section 18 of MCOC Act in a Separate Trial.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from an order passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Cross Petitions on Industrial Court's Decision Regarding Permanency of Temporary Municipal Workers. The Determination Turns on Compliance with BPMC Act and MRTU & PULP Act, Including Model Standing Order 4C.

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from a complaint filed by temporary workers of Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Based on Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence. Section 106 of Evidence Act Shifts Burden on Husband for Wife's Death in Matrimonial Home.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of Balveer Singh by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The case involved the murder of Biren...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Child Witness. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Foundational Facts for Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balveer Singh, who was originally convicted by the trial court f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Railway Bio-Diesel Supply Dispute — Fall Clause Interpretation Upheld. Court finds that comparing prices for different delivery distances without adjusting for freight is impermissible, and the arbitral tribunal's view is plausible.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Central Railway) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbit...