PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.259 OF 2009
10 Mar 2010The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bhimshakti Vichar Manch, a registered trust, and another petitioner, challenging the Foodgrain Based Disti...
Search Results for "central sales tax"
1023 result(s) found
Found 1023 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Allowing Further Proceedings Without Prior Enquiry Under Section 245D(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the Settlement Commission has discretion to decide whether a further enquiry is necessary and that the order under Section 245D(2C) is a preliminary satisfaction order not requiring a report under Section 245D(3).
21 Oct 2013The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Pune filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 August 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Com...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Reference in Income Tax Case on Weighted Deduction, Capital Expenditure, and Revenue Receipt. Interest on Export Packing Credit Not Eligible for Section 35B Deduction; Professional Fees for Cement Project Held Capital Expenditure; Settlement Amount from Swiss Company Treated as Revenue Receipt.
5 Sep 2012This judgment by the Bombay High Court pertains to an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an appeal by...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.
14 Feb 2020The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material — Reassessment Based on Search of Third Party Without Nexus to Assessee's Income Not Valid
22 Aug 2005The petitioner, Sanghvi Swiss Refills Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of ball pens and refills, challenged notices dated March 30, 1989 issued under Section...
- 50
High Court
High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim in GST Arrest Case -- Petitioner's Allegations of Illegal Detention Rejected -- Proper Procedure Followed Under CGST Act
5 Feb 2026The petitioner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for alleged illegal arrest and detention by GST authorities -- ...
- 702
High Court
Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.
25 Jun 2026The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act in Demurrage Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings Below. Clause 10(v) Held to Create Direct Liability for Demurrage, Not Indemnity, and Counterclaim for Option Cargo Damages Rejected.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose from a coal supply contract dated 18 September 1999 between the appellant, an Indian company, and the respondent, an Australian comp...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.
21 Dec 2016The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge's Order on State Government's Authority Over Inter-State Electricity Transmission. The Court examined whether the State Government could extend its Order to inter-state transmission of electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003.
19 Dec 2025The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ appeals filed by the State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC), Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Lim...
- 34
