Search Results for "arbitrary scheme"

2700 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2700 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Railway Advertisement Restricting ATVM Facilitator Posts to Retired Employees. Condition Held Not Arbitrary as It Serves Administrative Convenience and Does Not Violate Article 14.

The petitioner, Furquan Akram, an educated unemployed individual, challenged an advertisement dated 11.08.2015 issued by the South Central Railway for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Reservation Case — State Cannot Alter Reservation After Election Process Begins. Corrigendum Issued After Publication of Final Reservation List and Commencement of Election Process Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, seven Gram Panchayats in Parli-Vaijnath taluka, Beed district, constituted under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Legality of Land Acquisition for Jaipur Metro Rail Phase II, Focusing on Compliance with Section 5A Hearing. The Court Examined Whether Denial of Personal Hearing to Landowners Vitiates Acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court heard civil appeals by landowners challenging a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that reversed a Single Judge's o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under Slum Act for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) — Acquisition of Petitioner's Land by Deputy Collector Set Aside for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, NESCO Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of its land bearing CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Employee Transferred from Government Institute to Government Company. Holds That Pensionary Benefits Cannot Be Denied on Ground of Transfer Without Option to Retain Government Pension Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Prakash Parshuram Mavlankar, was employed with the erstwhile Haffkine Institute, a government entity under the State of Maharashtra, f...