Search Results for "Stay Pending Appeal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Stay Pending Appeal"

3352 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3352 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

7 Feb 2014

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Builder’s Writ Petition Challenging NCDRC’s Rejection of Condonation of 1132-Day Delay; No Perversity Found. Delay in Appeal Against State Commission Order Not Sufficiently Explained Under Section 23 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

4 Apr 2025

The petitioners, a construction firm and its partners, launched a real estate project and received an investment of Rs. 6,50,000/- from the respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Confirming Sale of Partnership Assets. Concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and District Judge under Section 34 are not perverse and not liable to be interfered with in appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution Proceedings and Possession Warrants in Suit for Specific Performance. Third-party purchasers cannot resist execution of decree for specific performance when they purchased property during pendency of suit without obtaining leave of court under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC.

22 Sep 2025

The present writ petition was filed by M/s. Prembrothers Infrastructure LLP and M/s. DJ Sons Hospitality (the petitioners) challenging the execution p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by School Management Against Reinstatement of Probationary Teacher. Termination of probationer without inquiry and without approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act is invalid.

9 Jun 2010

The case involves an appeal by a school management (Shri Vinayak Vidhyadayini Trust and its Headmistress) against the order of the School Tribunal and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Maintenance Order Under DV Act — Foreign Divorce Decree Does Not Bar Domestic Violence Proceedings. The court upheld the magistrate's order granting maintenance and right to residence to the wife under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, rejecting the husband's argument that a US divorce decree precludes such relief.

22 Mar 2024

The case involves a revision application filed by Kaushal Arvind Thakker (applicant) challenging the judgment of the Sessions Court which dismissed hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Appeals of Accused in Dr. Narendra Dabholkar Murder Case — Rejects Bail on Grounds of Seriousness of Offence and Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. The court held that the appellant failed to make out a case for bail under Section 21 of the NIA Act, considering the gravity of the offence and the prima facie evidence of conspiracy.

6 May 2021

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Vikram Vinay Bhave under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Leave to Defend Application Not a First Statement on Substance of Dispute. Filing of application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC does not constitute submission of first statement on substance of dispute, and application under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before written statement is within time.

9 Apr 2018

The appellant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., fo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Distinction Between Section 34 of 1940 Act and Section 8 of 1996 Act Clarified. Order Referring Parties to Arbitration Set Aside as Trial Court Failed to Consider Whether Dispute is Arbitrable and Whether Application Under Section 8 Was Maintainable After Filing Written Statement.

9 Oct 2015

The appellant, Sri G.R. Amarnath, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the judgment and order dated ...

63 64 65 66 67

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)