Search Results for "wrong rule"

5024 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5024 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additional Licences Invalid.

The petitioners, manufacturers of colour televisions, imported Video Tape Deck Mechanism (VTDM) and Colour Picture Tubes (CPTs) against additional lic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...