Search Results for "political activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "political activities"

669 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Father's Petition for Daughter's Re-Admission in Unaided Minority School - School's Removal of Student for Absence and Fee Default Held Unjustified Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing. Removal from Rolls Amounts to Expulsion Under Section 17 of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

15 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Vikas Motewar, father and natural guardian of Ms. Durva Motewar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking direct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Nomination of Councillors Without Consultation with Party Leader. Section 63(2B) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 mandates consultation with leader of party before nomination.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Rajaram Appa Patil and Mangesh Sudhakar Tambe, filed a writ petition challenging the nomination of two councillors to the Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Pay Revision for Unaided Private Engineering College. Government Resolutions directing retrospective implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission recommendations held not binding on unaided private institutions, but prospective implementation required.

7 Sep 2018

The petitioners, D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and its managing trust D.Y. Patil Pratisthan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Part Performance Case - Doctrine of Part Performance Protects Possession of Purchaser Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The court held that dismissal of specific performance does not automatically divest possession if the purchaser is ready and willing.

15 Oct 2018

The case involves two counter appeals arising from a suit for specific performance and possession. The plaintiff, Suresh Kamte, entered into an agreem...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Bar Council's Suspension Order Against Advocate in Criminal Case — Suspension Without Disciplinary Proceedings Violates Natural Justice. Bar Council Cannot Suspend Practice Pending Criminal Trial Without Following Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961.

28 Jan 2025

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry since 2009, challenged the Bar Council's resolution dated 05.07...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Housing Board Allotment Amendment — Classification Based on Income and Land Ownership Upheld as Reasonable Under Article 14. Amendment to Regulation 4 and Regulation 9A of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, not arbitrary.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Housing Board Allotment Regulations Amendment — Classification Based on Income and Location Not Arbitrary. Challenge to Reservation Categories A and C under Regulation 4 and 9A of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983 fails as reasonable classification under Article 14.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Bhojappa K, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)