WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2024
21 Nov 2025The writ petition was filed by a partnership firm, Gurudatta Infrastructures, challenging the rejection of its technical bid in a tender floated by th...
Search Results for "improper rejection"
648 result(s) found
Found 648 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.
13 Dec 2006This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Enhanced Privilege Fees for Liquor Licence Transfer — Issues of Delay, Laches, and Alternate Remedy Examined Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949
30 Nov 2006The petitioner, Nagpur Distillers, a partnership firm holding licences for manufacturing country liquor (CL-I) and potable liquor (PLL), decided to co...
- 305
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petitions to Quash FIR No.311 of 2012 and Complaint C.C.No.410/SW/2012 Alleging Abuse of Process and False Implication in Matrimonial Dispute. Petitioners seek quashing under Article 226, claiming original complainant lodged false complaint in retaliation to an earlier FIR filed against her family in Punjab.
14 Oct 2013The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 9th October 2...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition with Direction for Partial Deposit, Stays Penalty Recovery in Tax Dispute. Assessing Officer's Rejection of Stay Application Without Reasons Held Improper; Stay Orders Must Reflect Prima Facie Assessment Under Section 220(6) Income Tax Act, 1961.
30 Jan 2013The writ petition was filed by Deloitte Consulting India Pvt. Ltd., a joint venture company, challenging a notice of demand dated 30 March 2012 issued...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Rejection of Change of Use Application for Stilt Parking Area under MRTP Act. Court rules that use of stilt area in cinema building cannot be changed without prior permission from planning authority as per sanctioned plan.
9 Jun 2005The dispute pertained to a writ petition filed by the petitioners, who claimed tenancy rights over a 2520 sq. ft. area in the Ganga-Jamuna Cinemas bui...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Upholding State Minister’s Decision in Evacuee Property Mutation Dispute. Minister's Order Had Set Aside Lower Authorities' Orders Restoring Evacuee Property Entries.
13 Jul 2005This Letters Patent Appeal arose from a dispute over evacuee properties in Lonavala. The original owner, Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu, migrated to Pak...
- 39
High Court
Madras High Court Restrains State from Granting Permanent Public Employment to Kin of Stampede Victims; Permits Temporary Appointments Subject to Judicial Review. The Court Holds That Compassionate Appointments Must Adhere to Constitutional Provisions Under Articles 14 and 16 and Cannot Be a Colourable Exercise of Power.
27 Jul 2026The writ petitions, filed as Public Interest Litigations under Article 226 of the Constitution, sought to restrain the State Government from granting ...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Four Accused in Attempt to Murder and Culpable Homicide Case. Court Holds That Death Caused by Septicemia Not Attributable to Assault, Eyewitness Testimonies Unreliable, and No Perversity in Trial Court’s View; Benefit of Doubt Rightly Given Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 307, 426 read with 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
6 Dec 2019The State of Goa filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challengin...
