Search Results for "extension agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "extension agreement"

1845 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1845 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Caste Claim of MLA. Caste Claim Invalidated Due to Lack of Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence and Adverse Vigilance Report Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.

23 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Sanjay Bhaskar Raimulkar, an elected Member of the Legislative Assembly from Mehkar Constituency in the 2014 elections, filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MPSC and State Petitions Challenging MAT Order on Shortlisting Criteria for Director of Health Services. Recruitment Rules Mandate Consideration of All Eligible Candidates, Not Shortlisting.

12 Jan 2018

The case involves a challenge by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the State of Maharashtra against an order of the Maharashtra Adm...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Auction of Mineral Block Due to Technical Glitch. Alleged Portal Failure Not Sufficient to Invalidate Auction Where Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Prejudice and Did Not Follow Up After Initial Technical Issue.

25 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Agravanshi Private Limited, challenged the auction process for Cavorem-Maina Mineral Block No. XVIII conducted by MSTC Limited on beha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against KPCL Officers in Unauthorised Occupation Dispute — Acts of Official Duty Not Constituting Criminal Offences. The court held that the complaint did not disclose ingredients of Sections 143, 147, 448, 427, 504, 506 IPC and proceedings were an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

6 Apr 2016

The petitioners, L. Prabhuswamy (Chief Engineer) and Abdul Majeed (Executive Engineer), were employees of Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (KPCL), a s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against KPCL Officers in Unauthorised Occupation Dispute — Acts of Official Duty Not Constituting Criminal Offences. The court held that where the allegations merely relate to acts of official duty without criminal intent, continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.

6 Apr 2016

The petitioners, L. Prabhuswamy (Chief Engineer) and Abdul Majeed (Executive Engineer), were employees of Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (KPCL), a s...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Petition for Clearance of Pigeon Peas Imported under Advance Payment Certificate. Dispute Centers on Whether Certificate Remained Valid Beyond Fiscal Year 2017-18.

8 Apr 2021

The case involved a writ petition filed by Rika Global Impex Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and engaged in the import a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Sand Removal Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of contractual terms was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not violate public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2021

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Suit: High Court Erred in Holding No Mortgage Created Despite Agreement to Deposit Title Deeds. Equitable Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Under Section 58(f) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Established Through Agreement and Evidence.

9 Sep 2024

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between the appellant (plaintiff) and the respondent (defendant) in February 1995, where the appellant advan...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)