Search Results for "enhancement without cross appeal"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Interim Maintenance Application in Family Court Appeal, Dismisses Husband's Stay Application. Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right and wife's employment does not automatically disentitle maintenance if her income is insufficient.

The case involves two interim applications in a Family Court Appeal. The wife, Purvi Mukesh Gada, filed an application (IA/16733/2023) seeking interim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KSRTC Appeal and Allows Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Injured Driver. Claimant, a retired driver, suffered 100% disability due to accident; court applied multiplier method and granted future prospects.

The case involves an appeal by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and cross-objections by the claimant, Hasanbasha, against the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Priest with Parkinson's Disease. Income Assessed at Rs.10,000 per Month with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 11 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the original claimants, Vasanti Satish Joshi and Kirti Satish Joshi, challenging the order dated 21 April 2016 passed by the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Inadequate Disability Assessment. Permanent Disability of 40% to Whole Body Considered for Loss of Future Income with 40% Future Prospects.

The appellant, Hiralal @ Hirabhai Ukabhai Makawana, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Blast Hole Drilling Dispute, Upholds Rate of Rs.115 per Meter for Work Done Without Formal Contract. Court Holds That Absence of Formal Agreement Does Not Preclude Payment on Quantum Meruit Basis for Work Actually Performed and Accepted.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a suit for recovery of Rs.22,76,673/- filed by M/s. Shri Sowmiya Enterprises (plaintiff/contractor) a...