Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Interim Maintenance Application in Family Court Appeal, Dismisses Husband's Stay Application. Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right and wife's employment does not automatically disentitle maintenance if her income is insufficient.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two interim applications in a Family Court Appeal. The wife, Purvi Mukesh Gada, filed an application (IA/16733/2023) seeking interim maintenance pending the final hearing of the appeal against the Family Court order granting maintenance. The husband, Mukesh Popatlal Gada, filed an application (IA/13095/2023) seeking stay of the Family Court order. The wife appeared in person, while the husband was represented by advocates Dushyant Purekar and Rajat Dedhia. The court, presided over by Justices B.P. Colabawalla and Somasekhar Sundaresan, heard both applications together. The court noted that the wife is employed but her income is insufficient for her maintenance. The court held that maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) is a continuing right and cannot be denied merely because the wife is employed. The court granted interim maintenance of Rs. 15,000 per month to the wife from the date of the application, i.e., from the date of filing of IA/16733/2023. The court dismissed the husband's application for stay, holding that the husband has not made out a case for stay and the wife's right to maintenance is a continuing right. The court directed that the interim maintenance be paid pending the final hearing of the appeal.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Interim Maintenance - Wife's Application for Maintenance - The wife sought interim maintenance pending appeal against Family Court order granting maintenance. The court held that maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right and the wife's employment does not automatically disentitle her to maintenance if her income is insufficient. The court granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 15,000 per month from the date of the application. (Paras 1-10)

B) Family Law - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Husband's Application for Stay - The husband sought stay of the Family Court order granting maintenance. The court dismissed the application, holding that the wife's right to maintenance is a continuing right and the husband has not made out a case for stay. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife is entitled to interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC pending the final hearing of the Family Court Appeal, and whether the husband's application for stay of the Family Court order should be granted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the wife's interim application (IA/16733/2023) and granted interim maintenance of Rs. 15,000 per month from the date of the application. The court dismissed the husband's application (IA/13095/2023) for stay of the Family Court order.

Law Points

  • Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right
  • wife's employment does not automatically disentitle maintenance
  • interim maintenance can be granted pending final determination
  • court must consider wife's income and needs
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (11) 135

Interim Application No. 16733 of 2023 in Family Court Appeal No. 39 of 2023 with Interim Application No. 13095 of 2023

2023-12-21

B.P. Colabawalla, Somasekhar Sundaresan

Purvi Gada (Applicant/Wife in IA/16733/2023 and Respondent in IA/13095/2023) appeared in person; Dushyant Purekar a/w. Rajat Dedhia, Advocates for Respondent/Husband in IA/16733/2023 and Applicant in IA/13095/2023

Purvi Mukesh Gada

Mukesh Popatlal Gada

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Interim applications in a Family Court Appeal concerning maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

Remedy Sought

Wife sought interim maintenance pending final hearing of the appeal; husband sought stay of the Family Court order granting maintenance.

Filing Reason

Wife filed for interim maintenance as she is employed but her income is insufficient; husband sought stay of the Family Court order.

Previous Decisions

Family Court had granted maintenance to the wife, which is under appeal.

Issues

Whether the wife is entitled to interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC pending the final hearing of the Family Court Appeal. Whether the husband's application for stay of the Family Court order should be granted.

Submissions/Arguments

Wife argued that she is employed but her income is insufficient for her maintenance, and she is entitled to interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. Husband argued that the wife is employed and therefore not entitled to maintenance, and sought stay of the Family Court order.

Ratio Decidendi

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right and cannot be denied merely because the wife is employed, if her income is insufficient for her maintenance. The court has the power to grant interim maintenance pending final determination of the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC is a continuing right. The wife's employment does not automatically disentitle her to maintenance if her income is insufficient.

Procedural History

The Family Court granted maintenance to the wife. The husband filed an appeal (FCA No. 39 of 2023) against that order. The wife filed IA/16733/2023 seeking interim maintenance pending the appeal. The husband filed IA/13095/2023 seeking stay of the Family Court order. Both applications were heard together on 21 December 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Cooperative Bank Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Concurrent Findings of Fact and Law Are Not Perverse. The Court upheld the recovery certificate issued under ...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as the authority failed to demonstrate how the detenue's ...