Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6829 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6829 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director in Income Tax Recovery — Director Not in Charge During Relevant Period. Section 179(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 requires that the person sought to be made liable must have been in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the company during the relevant period; mere directorship at the time of default is insufficient.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Geeta P. Kamat, challenged an order dated 22 December 2017 passed by the Income Tax Officer under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on BOT Concession Agreement — Agreement Not a Lease Under Maharashtra Stamps Act. Concession Agreement for Build, Operate and Transfer of Bridge Held Not to Create Leasehold Interest Under Section 2(n)(iii) of Maharashtra Stamps Act, 1958.

6 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Abhijeet Ashoka Infra Structure Pvt. Limited, entered into a Concession Agreement with the State of Maharashtra on 16/11/1998 for cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand Against Developer in Leasehold Development Agreement — Development Agreement Not Conveyance Under Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that a development agreement that does not transfer ownership or leasehold rights is not an instrument of conveyance under Section 2(g) of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, and thus not chargeable to stamp duty.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s Vaibhav Corp. Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, ch...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

16 Jun 2026

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

High Court

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

17 Feb 2016

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDR Scheme Application on Ground of Non-Quantification Before Cut-off Date. Quantification of Duty Admitted in Statement Recorded During Investigation Prior to 30 June 2019 Satisfies Eligibility Under Section 125(1)(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

10 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Bramhanand Kanojia, a sole proprietor engaged in dry cleaning services, challenged the rejection of his application under the Sabka Vi...

High Court

KAHC030001822015_1

9 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the appellant, a Commercial Tax Officer, was convicted by the S...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)