Summary of Judgement
Nature of Petition (Para 3):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging rejection of SVLDR Scheme declarations due to alleged non-quantification of duty before 30 June 2019.
Background (Paras 4-7):
- Summons Issued (28 June 2018): Approximate service tax liability of ₹21.70 lakhs admitted by Petitioner.
- Tax Payments Made: ₹13 lakhs paid initially, later updated to ₹23.73 lakhs (15 April 2019).
- SVLDRS Declarations: Applications under “investigation, enquiry, or audit” category rejected twice due to alleged non-quantification before 30 June 2019.
Petitioner’s Arguments (Paras 8-9):
- Duty was quantified in the statement recorded on 28 June 2018.
- Petitioner was willing to rectify any discrepancies and pay ₹28,72,603/- with interest.
Respondents’ Position (Para 9):
- Argued duty was quantified post-30 June 2019 in a show-cause notice.
- Conceded court precedents favoring the Petitioner’s position.
High Court's Analysis (Paras 10-13):
- Quantification: Petitioner’s admission of liability on 28 June 2018 amounted to quantification.
- Disqualification Provision (Section 125(1)(e)): Does not apply where quantification occurred before 30 June 2019.
Rectification under Section 126 (Paras 14-15):
- Authorities could have corrected the declaration figures instead of outright rejection.
- Court upheld Petitioner’s willingness to rectify discrepancies and pay interest.
Acts and Sections Discussed
- Finance Act, 1994
- Section 83: Issuance of summons for tax inquiries.
- SVLDR Scheme, 2019:
- Section 125(1)(e): Eligibility criteria for quantification before 30 June 2019.
- Section 126: Power to verify and adjust declarations.
- Section 127: Issuance of final certificates.
Ratio Decidendi:
- Admission of liability in a recorded statement suffices as “quantification” under the SVLDR Scheme.
- Authorities must facilitate rectification instead of dismissing declarations.
- Courts prioritize the Scheme’s purpose to resolve disputes amicably over procedural rigidity.
Subjects:
Taxation, SVLDR Scheme, Judicial Interpretation of Eligibility.
Tax Dispute Resolution, GST Compliance, Writ Petition, High Court Judgment, Quantification of Duty.
Case Title: Bramhanand Kanojia Versus The Union of India
Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (12) 116
Case Number: WRIT PETITION NO.1883 OF 2023
Date of Decision: 2024-12-11