Search Results for "advisory jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "advisory jurisdiction"

764 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

24 Jul 2015

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Tender Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Redevelopment Tender Process. Court Held That Appellant Failed to Show Any Legal Right to Be Considered as Developer and That Balance of Convenience Was Against Granting Injunction.

7 Apr 2016

The appellant, Ornate Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking to restrain Respondent No.1, the Abhyuday Nagar Sahakar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Ad-Interim Relief in Suit Challenging BMC's Demolition Notice. Occupants of Unauthorized Structures Not Entitled to Injunction Against Statutory Authority Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

26 Sep 2016

The appellants, occupants and owners of premises in Manish Apartment, Vile Parle, filed a suit seeking injunction against the Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Neighbourhood School's Obligation to Admit Students Under RTE Act — School Cannot Refuse Admission After State Government's Selection. The Court affirmed that once the admission process is completed by the State, the school has no option but to grant admission, as per Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and Rule 8 of the UP RTE Rules, 2011.

28 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by Petitioners, against the Respondents affirming the High Court's direction to grant admis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Release of Passport Seized Under Section 10(3)(h) of Passports Act, 1967 — Petitioner, a Nurse Working in Yemen, Had Passport Withheld on Allegation of Human Trafficking, Court Finds No Prima Facie Case and Orders Return of Passport.

4 Jun 2024

The petitioner, Shany Jose, a qualified nurse with a Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery, worked in Yemen from February 2011 at various hospitals...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Commissioner's Order Prohibiting Contract Labour in FCI Depots. Food Corporation of India Held Liable as Principal Employer for Direct Payment of Wages to Workers Under Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

9 Oct 2020

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and its officers, and a partner of a transport company, challengin...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Action and Reference for Contempt in Lalita Kumari Compliance Case. Court holds that petitioner failed to demonstrate any violation of directions in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. and that the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order was not perverse.

3 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Vishwas Sudhanshu Bhamburkar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reversion of Family Court Employees in Service Law Case — Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Are Void. Court Held That Appointments to Promoted Posts Must Be Made in Accordance with Statutory Rules and Not Merely on Administrative Orders.

6 Mar 2017

The petitioners were employees of the Family Court, Mumbai, who had been promoted to higher posts such as Cashier, Shirestedar, and Assistant Shireste...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)