Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MCOCA Case. Appeal Raises Issues on Requirement of Pecuniary Benefit and Validity of Approval and Sanction under MCOCA, 1999.

The matter arises from Criminal Appeal No. 930 of 2009 filed before the Bombay High Court under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit. Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Evaluated.

This regular first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenged the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2012 passed by the Seni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years quashed as there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reasons constituted a change of opinion.

The petitioner, Anil Radhakrishna Wani, a solicitor and advocate, was a partner of Little & Company and retired on 30 September 2002. Upon retirement,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Melting Loss Percentage Not Valid as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Had Examined the Issue.

The petitioner, Sound Casting Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its assessment for Assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Capital Gains Computation is Invalid.

The petitioners, A&J Associates (a partnership firm) and its partner Ajay Dilkhush Sarupria, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Withdrawal from Land Acquisition for Gavipuram Extension Layout. Court Holds That Section 48(1) Notification Not Gazetted Is Ineffective and Acquisition Completed in 1987 Bars Withdrawal.

The petitioners, legal representatives of original grantees of 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 26 of Nagadevanahalli Village, Bangalore, soug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...