Search Results for "Rule 137"

1180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor in Insolvency Case Due to Defective Demand Notice and Limitation Bar. Section 9 Application Under I&B Code Fails as Date of Default is Later Than Demand Notice and Invoices are Time-Barred.

The Appellant, M/s. Metals and Metal Electric Private Limited, an operational creditor, filed an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Granted Land Subject to Non-Alienation Condition. Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Executed During Non-Alienation Period is Void Under Karnataka SC/ST Act, 1978.

The civil revision petition arose from an order of the trial court rejecting the petitioners' application to reject the plaint in a suit for specific ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against Dismissal of Amendment Applications in Civil Suit. Dispute Involves Plea of Fraud in Consent Decree and Applicability of Procedural Bars under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The judgment arises from three writ petitions challenging a common order dated 30.10.2015 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 89/2006/B by the Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...