Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Divorce Case — Liberal Approach Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application to set aside the ex-parte order, as the defendant appeared on the adjourned hearing date and assigned good cause for her previous non-appearance.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Bhumika Ajgaonkar, was the defendant in a matrimonial petition filed by her husband, Ravi Ajgaonkar, under Article 4(4) of the Law of Divorce before the CJSD, Vasco-da-Gama. She was served with summons and appeared through counsel on 14/01/2009, seeking time. The suit was adjourned for written statement on 4/02/2009, but she did not appear. The suit was then adjourned to 18/02/2009, and due to her absence, the court ordered the suit to proceed ex-parte. On 20/04/2009, the defendant appeared and filed an application under Order 9 Rule 7 read with Section 151 CPC to set aside the ex-parte order, along with a written statement. She contended that she resided far away in Belgaum and that no hardship would be caused to the plaintiff. The trial court dismissed her application. The High Court, in this writ petition, examined the application of Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, which allows a defendant who appears on an adjourned hearing date and assigns good cause for previous non-appearance to be heard. The court noted that the defendant had appeared on 20/04/2009, which was an adjourned hearing date, and had assigned good cause (residing far away). The court held that the trial court ought to have allowed the application liberally, especially in matrimonial proceedings, and set aside the ex-parte order. The impugned order was quashed, and the trial court was directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 9 Rule 7 - Setting aside ex-parte order - Good cause - The defendant appeared on the adjourned hearing date and filed an application to set aside the ex-parte order, stating she resided far away. The court held that the trial court ought to have allowed the application liberally, especially in matrimonial matters, and set aside the ex-parte order. (Paras 2-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the defendant's application to set aside the ex-parte order dated 18/02/2009, despite the defendant appearing on the adjourned hearing date and assigning good cause for previous non-appearance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order dated 22/07/2009, and directed the trial court to proceed with the suit in accordance with law, setting aside the ex-parte order.

Law Points

  • Order 9 Rule 7 CPC
  • ex-parte order
  • setting aside ex-parte
  • good cause
  • liberal approach
  • matrimonial proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (05) 49

Writ Petition No.784 of 2009

2010-05-07

N.A. Britto J.

Mr. J. Vaz for Petitioner, Mr. G. Shirodkar for Respondent

Smt. Bhumika W/o. Ravi Ajgaonkar

Shri Ravi Harikant Ajgaonkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging dismissal of application to set aside ex-parte order in matrimonial proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the ex-parte order dated 18/02/2009 and be allowed to file written statement and participate in the suit.

Filing Reason

The trial court dismissed the petitioner's application to set aside the ex-parte order, despite her appearing on the adjourned hearing date and assigning good cause.

Previous Decisions

The trial court dismissed the application dated 20/04/2009 by order dated 22/07/2009.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the application to set aside the ex-parte order under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she resided far away and her non-appearance was due to good cause, and that no hardship would be caused to the plaintiff. Respondent opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, when a defendant appears on an adjourned hearing date and assigns good cause for previous non-appearance, the court should liberally allow the application to set aside the ex-parte order, especially in matrimonial proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

The defendant therefore sought to set aside the ex-parte order dated 18/02/2009. Rule 7, Order 9, C.P.C. reads as follows; Procedure where defendant appears on day of adjourned hearing and assigns good cause for previous non-appearance...

Procedural History

Matrimonial petition filed before CJSD, Vasco-da-Gama. Defendant served, appeared on 14/01/2009, sought time. Did not appear on 4/02/2009. Suit adjourned to 18/02/2009, proceeded ex-parte. Defendant appeared on 20/04/2009 and filed application to set aside ex-parte order. Trial court dismissed application on 22/07/2009. Petitioner filed writ petition in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Order 9 Rule 7, Section 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Murder Charge in Knife Assault Case, Conviction Under Section 304 Part II Sustained. The court held that the assault was not premeditated and the accused did not intend to cause death, reducing the offence from ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Divorce Case — Liberal Approach Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC. The court held that the trial court erred in dismissing the application to set aside the ex-parte order, as the defend...