Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, Adjudicates Group of Appeals from Order. The appeals arise from interlocutory orders in civil suits concerning property and agricultural land.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"
5298 result(s) found
Found 5298 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees - Transfer Order Not Shown to Be Mala Fide or Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act. The court held that the union failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971, as the transfer was a routine management decision.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment Order in Defamation Suit Execution — Attachment of Immovable Property Without Notice to Judgment Debtor Violates Order XXI Rule 54 CPC. Court holds that issuance of attachment warrant without prior notice to the judgment debtor and without recording reasons is illegal and liable to be set aside.
4 Sep 2013The petitioner, Dilipkumar Hirachand Jain, was the original plaintiff No.2 in Special Civil Suit No.332 of 1996, which was a suit for damages for defa...
- 119
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.
23 Sep 2014This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.
15 Nov 2006The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Applicability of Biological Diversity Rules to Indian Entities. Rule 17 of Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 and Benefit Sharing Regulations Apply to All Entities, Not Just Foreign Entities.
28 Sep 2016The petitioners, comprising an association of Ayurvedic drug manufacturers and individual companies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Age Relaxation for MPSC Examination — 1939 Rules Not Applicable to MPSC Recruitment. Petitioner, a Food Safety Officer aged 39, sought age relaxation under Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1939 to appear for Combined Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2023, but Court held that the 1939 Rules do not apply to MPSC recruitment and no relaxation is permissible.
26 May 2023The petitioner, Raju Dhondiram Akrupe, a Food Safety Officer employed by the State of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Transfer Dispute. Industrial Court's Refusal to Stay Transfer Orders Upheld as No Prima Facie Case of Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU and PULP Act.
15 Mar 2016The petitioner, Engineering Workers Association, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.
11 Feb 2022The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...
- 91
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.
4 Feb 2010The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...
- 37
