Search Results for "third party challenge"

3911 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3911 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a gala in Dhiraj Pen Compound, Andheri, filed a suit challenging a demolition notice dated 17 September 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration Despite Initial Exculpatory Statement. Kerosene Smell and Medical Evidence Corroborate Guilt Under Sections 302 and 506 IPC.

The appellant, Jagbir Singh, was convicted under Sections 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of his wife, Santosh, by pouring ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Muslim Personal Law Overrides Karnataka Stamp Act. Settlement Deed Among Muslim Parties Not Required to Be Stamped Under Article 48 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (daughters and widow of late T.A. Abdul Jabbar) against the appellants (sons of late T.A. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...